ON-CHAIN · USDT flows behind elmourabut & lucasmartirini (Ethereum mainnet)
Verified against Tether's official USDT contract (0xdAC17F958D2ee523a2206206994597C13D831ec7),
exactly the verification Housebets' questionnaire response invites: deposits that are
"independently verifiable on-chain" (answers 17-18, 8 Jul 2026).
All times UTC. All three transfers completed successfully (status: success).
================================================================================
13 May 2026  16:20:35   100,000.00 USDT   0x675B... (wallet behind elmourabut)   ->  0x329F... (shared wallet)
21 May 2026  20:03:23    20,000.00 USDT   0x329F... (shared wallet)              ->  0xCdF1... (wallet behind lucasmartirini)
23 May 2026  05:36:11    40,000.01 USDT   0x329F... (shared wallet)              ->  0xCdF1... (wallet behind lucasmartirini)
================================================================================
Timeline against Housebets' own statements
· 13 May: the 100,000 USDT funding transfer is public on Ethereum.
· 19-20 May: elmourabut and lucasmartirini accounts created (their profiles).
· 21 & 23 May: 60,000.01 USDT moves from the shared wallet to the wallet behind
  lucasmartirini, inside the "18-28 May" cycle window Housebets' own PDF applies.
· 25-26 May: the race night; $91,168 deposited and lost defending 1st place.
· 29 May 21:20: official email: "We have checked and can confirm that both
  elmourabut & lucasmartirini are legitimate and eligible accounts."
· 30 May: both accounts vanish from the leaderboard.
· 29 Jun: official PDF, section 7: "a linked external cluster... flagged by the
  risk engine for bonus abuse and lossback abuse... contribution was zeroed."
  Flag date: never disclosed.
· 8 Jul: questionnaire response: the accounts were "funded with on-chain USDT
  deposits that are independently verifiable on-chain."

Notes
· What the chain proves: wallet to wallet, with public timestamps. Wallet to
  username attribution rests on each account's registered deposit address, a
  record held by Housebets and redacted in their own PDF. The standing demand:
  confirm or deny that these are the two accounts' registered deposit wallets,
  and produce the first flag date; if they are not, produce the real ones.
· Address-poisoning warning: the public histories of these wallets contain spam
  transfers using counterfeit tokens that imitate USDT and look-alike addresses
  (e.g. imitations of the 0xCdF1... wallet repeating similar amounts). Only the
  three transfers above are cited here; each was checked against the official
  Tether contract. Nothing else in those wallet histories is relied on.
· Full transaction hashes and unredacted addresses: available to any independent
  reviewer on request.